Being observed in particular these days is the 18 acre so called Christmas tree lot at the southeast corner of Heathercliff and PCH, now that the city has purchased it and revealed, surprise, it does not have to be used for a Metro park-and-ride site.
That use originally disclosed by city manager Reva Feldman was suppose to be in return for the city receiving $2 million from Metro toward the total purchase price of $42 million for the lot and two other commercial zoned parcels in the city.
As I comment on public radio 99.1 KBUU and select websites, the purchase was ostensibly deemed a good deal, approved by our neophyte, undiscerning council; no one at least publicly wants to see more commercial development in Malibu.
But it was subsequently made clear that residents do not want it paved over for a not needed park-and-ride lot. And there are other considerations, dare I mention aesthetic in this age of philistines, for some sort of eco friendly project to serve as a focal point for public use and pride.
Beyond its seasonal use for the overpriced sale of forlorn fir trees, the lot has to be one of the non descript blights among many that mark the city’s fragmented PCH façade.
Yes, Malibu’s spectacular seacoast setting of sprawling beaches set beneath a backdrop of striking mountains distinguishes it as a singular rural seacoast village, arguably one of the prettiest and pricey settings in the world: as the city’s gateway signs proclaim: “21 miles of scene beauty.”
But by any architecture and landscape measures, most of meandering PCH through Malibu is sadly unsightly, studded with strip commercial, off-putting restaurants, bland housing, and vacant lots mooning its main street:
21 miles of schlock that if its wasn’t for glimpses of water would be not much different than most of Southern California’s inland sprawl,
So the central question is: whither the Christmas Tree Lot at the ignominious ugly entry to Pt. Dume? Will it be used for a community amenity or just as another political exercise for a paper shuffling bloated Malibu City Hall? And where is that “robust and transparent” community dialogue promised? Or is it just more bureaucratic b.s?.
It should be noted that some interesting ideas for the lot have been proffered in the social media and in response to KBUU commentaries. And some respected design locals have indicated they would volunteer their talents in an open planning effort, a welcomed gesture of hope over experience.
One does have to be wary, given the city’s nefarious history of subterfuge and obfuscation, hiring servile staff and consultants, yielding to special interests behind closed doors, and generally compromising the Malibu.
Governance in Malibu is clouded, and not a pretty picture, and as a result neither is the Malibu cityscape. Perhaps the promised planning of the three parcels will be an exception. Perhaps.